Tuesday, March 20, 2012



Lenoxus said...

I presume the law is intended to keep the person's image recognizable. If so, Alm certainly remained well within te spirit if the law; if I saw him without a colander I think I'd know who he is.

Religious exemptions are usually stupid. Why not just say "headgear is permitted if it doesn't obscure the person's features too much?" There ya go.

Aaron Kinney said...

His intention is to mock the whole thing. Are you not familiar with FSM?